Mechanised Opinion-Making: Arguments for Systematic Political Nudging

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n4.015

Keywords:

Opinion-making, political behaviour, election, public opinion, political nudging

Abstract

People undergo genuine opinion change over time. It is natural when this change is driven by new communication means, better information sources or new issues and agendas hovering in the environment are adding or replacing old ones. But when external agencies somehow control the opinion-making process, this is where ‘mechanised opinion-making budding out. The paper, through the survey data, tries to find out how opinions are being manipulated and throw light on the political behaviour of voters in the context of their interaction with new media tools.

Author Biography

Dr. Siraj Husain Shah, Department of Political Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India-202002

Dr. Siraj Husain Shah received his Bachelor of Science in Mathematics and Statistics from University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, Master of Arts in Public Administration from Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. He obtained his Ph.D. Degree in Public Administration in Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. He is working in the field of Psephology. His key interest areas are elections, party politics, and public policy.

References

Ginsberg Morris. The Psychology of Society. Methuen. 1924.

Almond Gabriel A, and G Bingham Powell. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little Brown Company. 1966.

Zaller John R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge university press. 1992.

Horton PB, CL Hunt. Sociology. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company. 1964.

Bryce James. The American Commonwealth. Vol. 1. Macmillan. 1889.

Converse Philip E. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, edited by David Apter. New York: Free Press. 1964.

Achen Christopher H. Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response. American Political Science Review 69 (4). 1975: 1218–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955282.;

Dean Gillian, Thomas Welling Moran. Measuring Mass Political Attitudes: Change and Unreliability. Political Methodology. 1977: 383–413; Erikson Robert S. The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes. British Journal of Political Science 9 (1). 1979: 89–114.;

Judd Charles M, Jon A Krosnick, Michael A Milburn. Political Involvement and Attitude Structure in the General Public. American Sociological Review. 1981: 660–69.;

Judd Charles M, Michael A Milburn. The Structure of Attitude Systems in the General Public: Comparisons of a Structural Equation Model. American Sociological Review. 1980: 627–43.;

Feldman Ofer, Kazuhisa Kawakami. Leaders and Leadership in Japanese Politics: Images during a Campaign Period. Comparative Political Studies 22 (3). 1989: 265–90.;

Zaller John R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge university press. 1992.

Zaller John, Stanley Feldman. A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36 (3). 1992: 580. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111583.

Zaller John R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge university press. 1992.

McClung Lee Alfred, Elizabeth Briant Lee. The Fine Art of Propaganda: A Study of Father Coughlin’s Speeches. Institute for Propaganda Analysis. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. 1939.

Jowett Garth S., Victoria O’Donnell, eds. Readings in Propaganda and Persuasion: New and Classic Essays. SAGE Publications. 2005.

Apoorvanand. The Reason for Renaming Places. The Hindu. November 2018.

Downloads

Published

20-04-2025

How to Cite

Shah, S. H. (2025). Mechanised Opinion-Making: Arguments for Systematic Political Nudging. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n4.015