Strengthening Mathematical Understanding through Innovative Teaching Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n09.020Keywords:
Innovative teaching strategies, mathematical understanding, conceptual learning, activity-based learning, digital tools in educationAbstract
Strengthening mathematical understanding among school students is a crucial goal in contemporary education, as mathematics forms the foundation for critical thinking, problem-solving, and logical reasoning. Traditional teaching methods, which often emphasize rote memorization and procedural learning, frequently fail to foster deep conceptual understanding. This article explores innovative teaching strategies that promote meaningful engagement with mathematical concepts and enhance students' overall comprehension. Techniques such as activity-based learning, use of digital tools and simulations, real-life problem integration, collaborative learning, and differentiated instruction are discussed in detail. These strategies not only make learning more interactive and enjoyable but also cater to diverse learning styles and abilities. The article draws upon current pedagogical research and case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of these innovations in improving student outcomes. Emphasis is also placed on the role of teacher training, curriculum design, and assessment reforms in sustaining these practices. Ultimately, the integration of innovative teaching approaches in mathematics education holds the potential to transform classrooms into dynamic spaces where students actively construct knowledge, develop confidence, and cultivate a lifelong appreciation for mathematics.
References
Abramovitz, B., Berezina, M., Bereman, A., & Shvartsman, L. (2012). A blended learning approach in mathematics. In A. Ajuan, M. A. Huertas, S. Trenholm, & C. Streegmann (Eds.), Teaching mathematics online: Emergent technology and methodologies (pp. 22–42). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-875-0.ch002
Aggarwal, R. (2022). Approaches to enhance mathematical thinking to realize NEP 2020 vision for young learners. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(4), 557–561.
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective pedagogy in mathematics. International Academy of Education.
Awodeyi, A. F., Akpan, E. T., & Udo, I. J. (2014). Enhancing teaching and learning of mathematics: Adoption of blended learning pedagogy in University of Uyo. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(11), 40–45.
Beena, A. V. (2021). Innovative practices in teaching mathematics. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 10(7–12), 18–23. http://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/ijmer/pdf/volume10/volume10-issue7(12)/4.pdf
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. ASCD.
Bulun, M., Gulnar, B., & Guran, S. M. (2004). Mobile technologies in education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 3(2), Article 23.
Calleja, J. (2016). Teaching mathematics through inquiry. Journal of The International Society for Design and Development in Education, 3(9), 1–19. https://educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume3/issue9/article30/pdf/ed_3_9_calleja_16.pdf
Clarke, D. M. (1997). The changing role of the mathematics teacher. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 278–308.
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (2009). Constructivist learning and teaching. In Vinetere, A. (2018), A constructivist approach to teaching of mathematics to boost competencies needed for sustainable development. Rural Sustainability Research, 39, 2–7.
Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great Web Quest. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28(8), 6–9, 58.
Goel, N. (2022). Mathematics in NEP 2020: Initiative to strengthen foundational literacy and numeracy skills. ISOR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), Series V, 48–51.
Gray, A. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning. SSTA Research Center Report. Retrieved from http://saskschoolboards.ca/research/instruction/97-07.htm#
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Khongji, P., & Nongbsap, W. (2013). Some innovations in teaching of mathematics. International Journal of Science & Research, 4(7), 1345–1349.
Lin, Y. W., Tseng, C. L., & Chiang, P. J. (2016). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1221a
Mangal, S. K. (2016). Pedagogy of mathematics. Tandon Publications.
McCary, K. (2007). Constructivist approach: Improving social studies skills academic achievement (Postgraduate dissertation). Marygrove College. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499380.pdf
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (1986). National policy on education. Government of India. http://ncert.nic.in/pdf/nep/policy_1986_eng.pdf
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2020). National education policy. Government of India. http://ncert.nic.in/pdf/nep/NEP_2020.pdf
National Assessment Survey (NAS) Report. (2017). NCERT. https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/NAS/withReleaseDate_NPPTL.pdf
National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2005). National curriculum framework for school education. NCERT. https://ncert.nic.in
NCERT. (2006). Position paper by national focus group on teaching of mathematics. NCERT.
Nayak, R. K., & Senapaty. (2011). Effect of constructivist approach in fostering creativity of primary school children. Journal of Indian Education, 37(3), 85–93.
Sharma, M. (2017, October 14). Speaking tree. Times of India.
Simon, M., & Schifter, D. (1993). Towards a constructivist perspective: The impact of a mathematics teacher in-service program on students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(4), 331–340.
Sims, R. R. (2002). Teaching business ethics for effective learning. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Singh, C., & Rohatgi, R. P. (2005). Teaching of mathematics. Dominant Publishers and Distributors.
University Grants Commission. (n.d.). Blended mode of teaching and learning: Concept note. https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/6100340_Concept-Note-Blended_mode-of-Teaching-and-Learning.pdf
Walia, P. (2020). Paradigm shift in pedagogical practices in mathematics classroom: NEP 2020. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8(12), 2902–2908. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348617509_Paradigm_Shift_in_Pedagogical_Practices_in_Mathematics_Classroom_NEP_2020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
