The Necessity of Critical Scientific Literacy in the Context of India's National Education Policy 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n11.010Keywords:
Critical scientific literacy, India, scientific literacy, science education, NEP 2020, NCF-SE 2023, socio-scientific concerns, public participationAbstract
India's recent National Education Policy (NEP 2020) and National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE 2023) signify a significant shift from rote memorization to inquiry-based, conceptual comprehension. This paper argues that, despite the potential of these educational improvements to enhance scientific literacy (SL), they primarily focus on functional and civic abilities (Roberts' Vision I/II), neglecting the essential aspect of Critical Scientific Literacy (CSL). CSL (Hodson's Vision III) integrates a socio-political dimension, equipping students to analyse scientific social contexts, interrogate authority structures, and engage in informed activism. This is especially significant within India's context, characterized by complex socio-scientific problems (SSIs) such as health-related disinformation, climate inequities, and industrial environmental pollution. This analysis first distinguishes CSL from traditional SL, then investigates the "critical deficiency" in these new policy frameworks. The conclusion proposes a localized CSL paradigm, asserting that Indian scientific education must advance beyond inquiry-based instruction to encompass socio-political participation for the full empowerment of citizens.
References
Aggarwal, J. C. (2020). Science education in India: Retrospect and prospect. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 86(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2020/v86i1/49813
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
Arora, A., & Kumar, R. (2021). Science communication through digital platforms in India: A study of popular science channels on YouTube. Journal of Science Communication, 20(02), A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20020204
Banerjee, P. (2019). Science literacy in India: Conceptualizing challenges and strategies. Current Science, 117(7), 1101-1106. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v117/i7/1101-1106
Bhattacharya, S., & Opengart, R. (2017). Attitude and perception towards science education in India: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p1
Bhattacharya, S., & Turvey, S. T. (2018). Integrate indigenous knowledge systems into global sustainability science. Nature Sustainability, 1(12), 726-728. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0193-y
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.7
Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436-1437. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554
Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Science, new media, and the public. Science, 339(6115), 40-41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232329
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Scientific literacy for a changing world: Science education for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Science Scope, 37(7), 52-58.
Chakravarty, S., Saikia, P., & Bhardwaj, A. (2020). Science communication landscape in India: A case study on understanding science blogs. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 540-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520922896
Chatterjee, S. (2018). Teacher shortage in science and mathematics in India: A case study from West Bengal. International Journal of Educational Development, 59, 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.007
Chaudhury, S., & Chakraborty, R. (2018). Communicating science to non-English speakers: Challenges and opportunities in India. Journal of Science Communication, 17(2), A04. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17020204
Dhawan, S. (2019). Science education in India: Issues and challenges. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(21), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-21-06
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
DST (Department of Science and Technology). (2021). National Science Day. Retrieved from https://www.dst.gov.in/national-science-day
Hodson, D. (2014). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2579-2606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.949103
Iyengar, S., Kaushik, A., & Mhaskar, R. (2020). A report on the national science festivals in India. Current Science, 119(2), 238-242. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v119/i2/238-242
Levinson, R. (2019). Democratic deliberation and the challenge of ideological diversity: Discourse ethics, epistemic inclusion, and public reasoning. Journal of Public Deliberation, 15(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-0681.15.1.4
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.003
McClune, B., Jarman, N., & Welford, J. (2018). Science education, democracy and the referendum debate on UK membership of the European Union. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 423-447. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21422
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King's College London School of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.
National Academy of Sciences. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595
National Curriculum Framework. (2005). National Council of Educational Research and Training.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962
NCERT. (2023). National Curriculum Framework for School Education. National Council of Educational Research and Training.
Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
Prakash, V. (2019). Science communication in India: A review. Science & Education, 28(9-10), 1153-1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00084-5
Ramadas, J., & Marwaha, S. (2020). Science education in rural areas of India: Challenges and way forward. Current Science, 118(3), 353-357. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v118/i3/353-357
Rao, S., & Thakur, A. (2020). Inclusive science education for students with disabilities: A call to action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1153-1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21626
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy: From theory to practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9024-x
Schiele, B. (2016). The role of science centers and museums in the public engagement with science and technology. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp. 224-236). Routledge.
Singh, A. P., & Upadhyay, A. (2018). Community-led science education in rural India: A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1039-1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21445
Singh, A. P., Chaturvedi, R., & Chaturvedi, A. (2When 17). eBird India: Citizen science for conservation and research. Current Science, 112(6), 1126-1132. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i6/1126-1132
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering Public Understanding of Science and Scientific Literacy from a STS and Education Perspective. In I. Eilks & J. Sjöström (Eds.), Relevant Education and Humanistic Education (pp. 43-61). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73136-2_3
Srivastava, R. (2018). Science education in the digital era: Challenges and opportunities in India. Science Education International, 29(4), 300-307.
Welch, W. W. (2011). Scientific literacy: An overview. Science, 333(6046), 659-662. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205761
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).