Urban Functionality and Sphere of Influence: A Case Study on Urban Centres of Darjeeling and Jalpaiguri District, West Bengal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2022.v07.i09.007Keywords:
periphery region, functional importance, sphere of influence, hierarchical distributionAbstract
City and their surroundings are functionally interdependent and it grows through interaction with the periphery. If an urban centre develops, it diffuses its development in surrounding rural areas which can help to develop the whole region. For this reason, it is necessary to find out the growth centres their functional relations with the adjoining area. This paper is an attempt to identify the functional importance of the urban centres their hierarchical distribution and also to delineate the sphere of influence of urban centres of Darjeeling and Jalpaiguri district of West Bengal. Various statistical techniques are to be incorporated for this purpose. The result indicates that higher the functional importance greater the zone of influence and vice-versa.
References
Ali MJ, Varshney D. Spatial Modeling of Urban Growth and Urban Influence: approach of regional development in developing economy. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis. 2012; IV (2): 129-148.
Berry BJL. Relationships Between Regional Economic Development and the Urban System: The Case of Chile. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie1969; 60: 283- 307.
Bhatta. Micro level planning-a study of karnal area Haryana india. K.B.Publication, New Delhi1976.
Census of India. Provisional Population Totals. Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, India2011.
Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany, doctoral diss. University of Heidelberge, Munich.1933.
Foebe JD. Central place Theory – An Analytical Framework for Retail Structure. Land Economics. University of Wisconsin Press1962;48 (1):15.
Gaile GL. The Spread-Backwash Con- cept. Regional Studies1980;14 (1):15-25.
Glasson J. An introduction to regional planning. 2nd ed. Tiptree Essex, Great Britain: Anchor Press Ltd.1978.
Gould WTS. People and education in the Third World. Routledge,Tralor & Francis Group,London and Newyork.2014.
Grotewold A. Searching for Core Area Growth. GeoJournal. Kluwer Academic Publishers1990;22(4):399-407,399-408.
Hagget P,Gunwardena KA. Determination of population thresholds for settlement functions by reed muench method. Journal of Professional Geographer1965;16(4):6-9.
.Kong X.Study on city′s economic hinterland and itsspatial definition—Take Chengdu and Mianyang as examples.Chengdu. Southwest Jiaotong University2007.
Nagia S,Ahluwalia D. Hierarchy of urban settlement in Northern Upper Ganga Plain. Indian Journal of Regional Science2003; 35(2): 27-35.
Parr JB.Growth Poles, Regional Development, and Central Place Theory. Papers of the Regional Science Association1973;31:173-212.
Pawar CT,Lokhande TN.Centrality and hierarchy of market centres in Kolhapur district, Maharashtra. The Deccan Geographers 2001; 39 (1): 1–14.
Prakas RVLS. Towns of Mysore State.Asia, Bombay1958;25-26.
Richardson HW. Regional Economics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press1979.
Singh RL. An approach to urban study in India. Census publication, New Delhi, 1961;199.
Verma LN. Urban Geography.1 st ed. Rawat Publication.2008.
Wang D,Zhao J. HAP: A computer assisted hinterland division system—Its development and application.City Planning Review 2000; 24 (12): 37–41.
Yasenovskiy V,Hodgson J. Hierarchical location-allocation with spatial choice interaction modeling. Annals of the Association of American Geographers2007; 97 (2): 469–511.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).