The role of [animate] and [human] features in agreement in Ho
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2022.v07.i09.013Keywords:
Ho language, agreement, animate feature, human feature, pro-drop languageAbstract
Ho language is classified as a member of the Munda group that belongs to the Austro-Asiatic branch. It is well known that Ho is very rich in agreement. The general pattern of agreement sentences of languages is that agreement is overtly realized between an argument NP and verb; subject-verb / object-verb agreement. However, agreement is not morphologically manifested and is covert if the functional head agreement is weak in Ho. Moreover, it also shows agreement phenomena in terms of [±animate] and [±human]. Therefor this paper is to layout the basic patterns of agreement with the role of [animante] and [human] in Ho.
References
Burrows, L. 1980. Grammar of The HO Language. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.
Crystal, D. 1991. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Deeney, J. J. 1991. An Introduction to the Ho language. Bihar: Xavier Ho Publication.
Koh, Taejin. (2002). ‘Agreement in Ho’. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. Delhi: University of Delhi.
Koh, Taejin. (2009). A Typological Grammar of Ho. Seoul: HUFS Press.
Subbarao, K. V. 1997. ‘Linguistic Theory and Syntactic Typology’. Moscow: A paper delivered at the International Conference on South Asian Languages.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).