A Bibliometric Study of SRELS Journal of Information Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n01.001Keywords:
Bibliometrics, Authorship pattern, citation distribution, Length of articlesAbstract
SRELS Journal of Information Management is UGC care listed and one of the oldest journals in the field of library and information science. The aim of the study is to analyze different publication attributes of the journal using bibliometrics research method. The study was conducted to examine the research output, types of articles submitted to the journal, authorship pattern, distribution of citations, relative growth rate and doubling time of the article. Total 748 articles were studied submitted during the period of 2010 to 2022. The data for study was extracted from the official site of the journal and was subjected to the bibliometric analysis. The result of the study has indicated that there is fluctuation in the number of articles submitted to the journal on yearly basis. Authorship pattern and different measures of collaboration has suggested that trend is towards collaborative research in the articles submitted to the journal. Distribution of citations in the journal has indicated that 748 articles submitted to the journal had 10693 citations. Relative growth rate and doubling time of the articles was also calculated.
References
A. Pritchard, "Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics," Journal of Documentation, vol. 25, pp. 348-349, 1969.
"SRELS Journal of Information Management," 12 12 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.srels.org/index.php/sjim.
S. K. Yadav, S. N. Singh and M. K. Verma, "Authorship and Collaboration Pattern in SRELS Journal of Information Management during 2008-2017: An evaluation," Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019.
V. Bapte and J. Gedam, "SRELS Journal of Information Management: A bibliometric Study," Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019.
C. Prabhu, "A study of Bibliometric Analysis of SRELS Journal of Information Management during 2016-2020," Journal of Information Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 65-73, 2021.
P. Singh and H. Chander, "Publication Pattern of IFLA Journal (2013-2019): A bibliometric Assessment," Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), no. 4879, 2021.
A. Natha and S. Jana, "Bibliometric Analysis of Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS)," Library Philosophy and Practice, no. 3685, 2020.
J. Barman, "A comparative Study of Bibliometric Characteristics of the DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology and Annals of Library and Information Studies," ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 48-54, 2020.
M. Anwar, "Contributions of Pakistani Authors to Library Philosophy and Practice from 2008 to 2017," Library Philosophy and Practice, no. 1763, 2019.
N. G. Raju, "A Scientometric Analysis of International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology (IJIDT) during 2011-2015," International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 146-150, 2017.
D. Mondal and S. Jana, "Collaborative Authorship trend in leading Indian LIS journals," DESIDOC Journal of Library an Information Technology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 320-325, 2018.
M. K. Singh, "Authorship Pattern and COllaboration Coefficient of India in Biotechnology research during 2001-2016: Based on Scopus Database," Library Philosophy and Practice, no. 1549, 2017.
S. Lawani, Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A bibliometric Study, Florida State University, 1980, p. 395.
K. Subramanyam, "Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a reivew," Journal of Information Science, vol. 6, pp. 33-38, 1983.
M. Mahapatra, "On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific Literature," in 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, 1985.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).