A Comparative Philosophical analysis of Dravya with Special reference to Yogacara and Vaisesika School


  • Asmin Saikh State Aided College Teacher, Dept. of Philosophy




Dravya, Nirvana, Padartha-dharma-sangraha, Yogacara, Substance


Several Indian intellectual traditions, including Buddhism, Jainism, and the Brahmanical systems of Vedanta, Sankhya, and especially Vaisesika, regularly utilise the term “dravya” in their philosophical and religious texts. There have been disagreements on the precise definition of the term dravya, which is usually translated as “substance,” as well as its historical development and meanings. Even the translation of dravya as “substance” raises questions because dravya isn’t necessarily thought of in terms of immutability, but substance is understood to be an idea that is. The idea of dravya has extremely diverse meanings in Buddhist and Brahmaical intellectual traditions, although being used in both. According to Vaisesika, one of the Brahmaical schools, reality is made up of interactions between substances, and Dravya is a genuine substance that exists independently of any knowing subject. In contrast, substances are viewed as merely labels in Yogacara Buddhism, only existing in connection to a knowing subject. Each entity may be regarded from the point of view of nirvana as either a substance or merely an idea, depending on the particular circumstances.


Acharya, Diwakar. (2014). On the Saiva Concept of Innate Impurity (mala) and the Function of the Rite of Initiation. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42, pp.9–25.

Anacker, Stephen. (1970). Seven works of Vasubandhu, the Buddhist Psychological Doctor. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass.

Asanga. (1950). Abhidharma-samuccaya. Critically edited and studied by Pralhad Pradhan. Santiniketan: Visva-Bharati.

Asanga. (2001). Abhidharmacamuccaya: The Compendium of the Higher Teaching (Philosophy) by Asanga. Originally translated into French and annotated by Walpola Rahula. English version by Sara Boin-Webb. Fremont: Asian Humanities Press.

Lorenzen, David. (1991). Kapalikas and Kalamukhas: Two Lost Saivite Sects. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

Grvl. Matilal, Bimal Krishna. (1998). The Character of Logic in India. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.

Monier-Williams, Monier. (1899). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.

Prasastapada. (2005). Sobranie kharakteristik kategorii (Padartha-dharma-saṃgraha) [The Compendium of the Characteristics of Categories]. Transl. into Russian by V.G. Lyssenko. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura.

Sanderson, Alexis (1992). The Doctrine of Malinivijayottara. Ritual and speculation in Early Tantrism. Studies in Honour of Andre Padoux. Ed. by T. Goudriaan. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, pp.281–312.

Vasubandhu. (1967). Abhidharmakosabhaṣya of Vasubandhu. Ed. by P. Pradhan. Patna: K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute.

Zheleznova N.A. (2012). Digambarskaia filosofia ot Umasvati do Nemichandry: istorikofilosofskie ocherki [Digāmbara Philosophy from Umasvati to Nemicandra: historic-philosophical essays]. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura.




How to Cite

Saikh, A. (2022). A Comparative Philosophical analysis of Dravya with Special reference to Yogacara and Vaisesika School. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 7(12), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2022.v07.i12.021