Institutions in Transition: Changing Trends in Marriage

Authors

  • P.M.Suresh Kumar Department of Social Work, Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n03.020

Keywords:

Social Contract, Religious Sacrament, Traditional Marriages, Business Opportunity, Investment, Profitability

Abstract

Marriage is a wedded relationship between members of opposite sexes, except otherwise sanctioned by law of the land, to unite together for a durable relationship of responsibility and need gratification. It is an institutional arrangement, compliance of which is mandatory to obtain social approval. Traditionally marriage amounted to a union of families characterized by larger involvement of family and kin and reciprocal relationships built between each other and consequent enlargement of the family circle, rather than that of two individuals. In the caste-ridden traditional Indian society, caste and communities functioned as a boundary wall limiting the expansion of choices. Contrary to this are the sparingly few still relevant self-selection marriages or love marriages which are hailed for cutting across diversities and developing deeper mutual understanding that is at the core of relationships, an alarming number of them end up in failure very soon. Modern marriages are business deals involving investments and matching of mutual gains. The modus operandi stands out hosting in lavish hotels and halls with huge spending on food, clothes, ornaments, and arrangements. The matching process itself is complex involving a host of factors such as age, education, appearance and beauty, wealth, profession, family status, the value of dowry, and astrological compatibility. This paper seeks to bring out the transition from home-based to hall-based marriage practices and accompanying changes marking the shift from traditional to modern marriages. It also tries to expose the role of compatibility matching as an intricate process involving innumerable factors in which age assumes the role of a major bargaining factor. Qualitative analysis involving experiential surveys and focus group discussions with key informants was adopted for the collection of data.

Author Biography

P.M.Suresh Kumar, Department of Social Work, Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram, India

Dr. Suresh Kumar received his Master degree in Social Work from Loyola College, Trivandrum and Ph.D in Sociology from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has vast experience of 18 years in teaching and research and served as Professor at Srinivas University, Mangalore and CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore. He has published extensively on wide range of topics in peer reviewed journals.  Currently serving as Head of Department of Social Work at Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram (Kerala).

References

Ahuja, Ram, Indian Social System, Rawat Publications, Jaipur,1993

Desai, I.P., Some Aspects of Family in Mahua, Asia Publishing House, Bombay,1964

Kapadia, K.M., The Family in Transition, Sociological Bulletin, September 1962

Karve, Irawati., Kinship Organisation in India, Oxford University Press, Bombay,1966

Mayer, A.C., Caste and Kinship in Central India, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London,1960

Mills, C.Wright, The Power Elite, Oxford University Press, New York,1956

Nagpaul, Hans, Modernisation, and Urbanisation in India: Problems and Issues, Rawat Publications, Jaipur,1996

Prabhu, P.N., Hindu Social Organisation, The Popular Book Depot, Bombay,1954

Rawat, H.K., Sociology: Basic Concepts,Rawat Publications, Jaipur,1996

Ross, Aileen.D, Hindu Family in its Urban Setting, Oxford University Press, Toronto,1961

Sharma, K.L., Social Stratification in India, Sage Publications, New Delhi

Singh, Yogendra, Modernisation of Indian Tradition, Thomson Press, New Delhi,1973

Srinivas, M.N., Caste in Modern India, Asia Publishing House, Bombay,1962

Taylor, C.C., A Critical Analysis of India’s Community, University of Chicago,1955

Downloads

Published

14-03-2023

How to Cite

P.M. Kumar, S. . (2023). Institutions in Transition: Changing Trends in Marriage. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 8(3), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n03.020