A Sociological Study of Paranormal Beliefs and Experiences in a Village in West Bengal

Authors

  • Suchandra Chattopadhyay Research Scholar, Department of Sociology, Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University, Purulia, West Bengal, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n01.004

Keywords:

Ghost beliefs, Paranormal, Ambiguity, Sociology

Abstract

This article examines the manifestations of paranormality in a village in West Bengal. It begins by engaging with sociological understandings of the idea of paranormal and then situates these ideas within the specific local context. The article further explores how ghost beliefs are positioned within broader notions of the paranormal in the selected village. It highlights the need to understand how people make sense of contested issues by examining the particular social context and the diverse forms of knowledge and belief. Drawing on empirical evidence, the study demonstrates how villagers collectively interpret certain events or situations as having paranormal qualities. Finally, the study highlights the central role of ambiguity in shaping these interpretations.

References

[1] Paschim-Medinipurer-Narayangarer-Raipur-grame-bhuter-atonko. [Ghost panic in Raipur village of Narayangarh, Paschim Medinipur]. (2019). ABP Ananda. https://bengali.abplive.com/west-midnapore-ghost-fear-617024

[2] Baker, J. O., & Bader, C. D. (2014). A social anthropology of ghosts in twenty-first-century America. Social Compass, 61(4), 569-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768614547337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768614547337

[3] Blackburn, S. H. (1985). Death and Deification: Folk Cults in Hinduism. History of Religions, 24(3), 255–274. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1062256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/462999

[4] Bokuniewicz, S. (2020). Tolerance of uncertainty and ambiguity of the situation and anxiety as a state and as a feature. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 11(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.224.236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.224.236

[5] Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2020). Thomas theorem in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 123(2), 553–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03389-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03389-6

[6] Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1979). The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific is Happening. The Sociological Review, 27(1_suppl), 237-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00064.x (Original work published 1979) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00064.x

[7] Eaton, M. A. 2020. Sensing spirits: Paranormal investigation and the social construction of ghosts. 544 1st ed. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020001-1

[8] Goode, E. (2000). Paranormal beliefs: A sociological introduction. Waveland Press.

[9] Hornby, A. S. (2015). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (7th ed.). Oxford University Press

[10] Ironside, R., & Wooffitt, R. (2021). Making sense of the paranormal: The interactional construction of unexplained experiences (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88407-9 (rgu-repository.worktribe.com) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88407-9

[11] Lindeman, M., & Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M. (2012). What's in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical, and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027158

[12] Markovsky, B., & Thye, S. R. (2001). Social Influence on Paranormal Beliefs. Sociological Perspectives, 44(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2001.44.1.21 (Original work published 2001) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1389807

[13] Morris, W. N., Worchel, S., Bois, J. L., Pearson, J. A., Rountree, C. A., Samaha, G. M., Wachtler, J., & Wright, S. L. (1976). Collective coping with stress: Group reactions to fear, anxiety, and ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(6), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.674

[14] Provencher, C. (2011), Towards A Better Understanding of Cognitive Polyphasia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41: 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00468.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00468.x

[15] Saha, S. (2023). The Deity of the ‘Minors’: Sitala Puja in India-the Continuity of the Folk Traditions in Indian Culture. Skylines of Anthropology, 3: 2, pp. 83-98. https://doi. org/10.47509/SA.2023. v03i02.02 https://www.arfjournals.com/image/catalog/Journals%20Papers/SKYLINES%20OF%20ANTHROPOLOGY/2023/No%202%20(2023)/2_Sukanya%20Saha.pdf

[16] Sarigiannidis, I., Grillon, C., Ernst, M., Roiser, J. P., & Robinson, O. J. (2020). Anxiety makes time pass quicker while fear has no effect. Cognition, 197, 104116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027719302902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104116

[17] Tidelius, C. (2020). The paranormal: Conceptualizations in previous research. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 29(1), 216–38. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.84823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.84823

[18] Varghese, C., & Kumar, S. S. (2022). Marginality: A Critical Review of the Concept. Review of Development and Change, 27(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722661221096681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09722661221096681

[19] Wajcman, J. (2008). Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British journal of sociology, 59(1), 59-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00182.x

[20] Zherebin, V. M., Vershinskaia, O. N., & Makhrova, O. N. (2015). The Modern Perception of Time and Acceleration of the Pace of Life. Sociological Research, 54(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2015.1098297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2015.1098297

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Chattopadhyay, S. (2026). A Sociological Study of Paranormal Beliefs and Experiences in a Village in West Bengal. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 11(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n01.004