Inside the Cage of Morality: A Gender Perspective

Authors

  • P.M.Suresh Kumar Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram, INDIA – 676517 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n02.014

Keywords:

Cage of Morality, Gender, Sexual differentiation, Sexual codes, Altruistic codes

Abstract

Fundamental to human society are certain existential principles that decide peace, stability and order. Most important among them is morality. Although morality is an all-encompassing term for right conduct and way of life, it most importantly connotes a divide based on sex. Sex segregates human beings into two classes, namely male and female. The conduct and behaviour of members of each of these classes is distinct enough to form distinct sexual roles. Looking from a historical angle, from time immemorial, men were the food gatherers who produced subsistence and protected the females; at the same time, the responsibility for bearing children and their upbringing was vested with the females. As societies became modern, overlapping functional roles have evolved. For instance, women entered the job market and became supplementary wage earners, overriding the male sovereignty as the sole breadwinners. Women became full-time agricultural labourers, opposed to their limited involvement in supporting the male. Similarly, care and protection of children has become a joint responsibility of the adult male, although childbearing as a biological function is still vested with the female. Advancements in education helped create a worldview that favoured considering women as equal counterparts with men. Despite all these complementarities, differences do exist that dictate distances in interactions, manner of self-expression, social constructs and identity. As a result, the differences between the male and the female are drawn so far apart that infringement will invite repudiation and punishment. The sexual differences and consequent do's and don'ts constitute a large volume of morality. It forms a cage that imprisons the person as he grows up and continues till the end of life. An attempt is made here to examine morality as springing from sexual differentiation and how it serves to imprison a person, similar to a cage.

References

[1] Adichie, Nagozi Chimamanda (2014), We Should All Be Feminists, Fourth Estate, London.

[2] Beauvoir, Simon de (1949), The Second Sex, Gallimard, Paris.

[3] Butler, Judith (1990), Gender Trouble, Routledge, New York.

[4] Coakley, Sarah (2013), God, Sexuality and the Self: An Essay on the Trinity, Cambridge University Press, New York.

[5] Driver, Julia (2006), Ethics--The Fundamentals, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, New York.

[6] Gilian, Carol (1982), In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London.

[7] Lindsey, Linda.L (2020), Gender-Sociological Perspectives, Routledge, London.

[8] Manne, Kate (2018), Down Girl--The Logic of Misogyny, Oxford University Press.

[9] Soskice, Janet (2007), The Kindness of God -- Metaphor, Gender and Religious Language, Oxford University Press, New York.

[10] Sramek, Joseph (2011), Gender, Morality and Race in Company India, Macmillan, New York.

[11] Wharton, S.Amy (2005), The Sociology of Gender--An Introduction to Theory and Research, Blackwell Publishing, Malden.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-14

How to Cite

Suresh Kumar, P. (2026). Inside the Cage of Morality: A Gender Perspective. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 11(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n02.014