Negotiating Craft Livelihoods in West Bengal: A Sociological Study of Dokra Artisans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n01.019Keywords:
artisan labor, India, livelihoods, West Bengal, BankuraAbstract
Contemporary development discourse often frames artisanal craft as a site of either cultural continuity or terminal decline, a binary that overlooks the structural reorganization of production under neoliberal market integration. This research moves beyond these reductive binaries to examine the structural transmutation of artisanal labor under the pressures of neoliberal market integration. The study utilizes an interpretive framework based on year-long ethnographic fieldwork between 2024 and 2025 among Dokra artisans in Bikna village, West Bengal. Data collection involved immersive observation, and forty-five semi-structured interviews with artisans and intermediaries, analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. Drawing on Tsing’s concept of friction, the research reveals that market integration is an unequal and unstable process that reshapes the domestic sphere. Kinship-based apprenticeship functions as a stratified labor regime that differentiates authority and risk along generational and gendered lines. Integration – mediated by NGOs and cooperatives – produces a frictional economy where bureaucratic gatekeepers redistribute market volatility downward while concentrating authority upward. Synthesizing Mannheim’s theory of generations, the paper introduces the concept of a reflexive artisan generation to theorize youth disengagement from Dokra craft as an adaptive rejection of inherited precarity. By reconceptualizing the transmission of craft knowledge as the intergenerational redistribution of risk, the study illuminates the structural contradictions inherent in craft commercialization.
References
[1] Banerjee, A. and Malakar, B. (2020). ‘Commercialization of a craft tradition: A study on Dokra artisans living in Dariapur region in West Bengal’, Eastern Anthropologist, 73(3–4).
[2] Basole, A. (2016). ‘Informality and flexible specialization: Apprenticeships and knowledge spillovers in an Indian silk weaving cluster’, Development and Change, 47(1), pp. 157–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12216
[3] Das, K. (2015) ‘Institutional constraints to innovation: Artisan clusters in rural India’, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 4(2), pp. 132–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2015.4.2.132
[4] Dhar, B.K., Chawla, U. and Mulchandani, D. (2024). Sustainable craft culture: Socio-cultural drivers and economic impact on sustainable development’, Sustainable Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3282
[5] Government of India (2024). Pradhan Mantri Vishwakarma scheme. Available at: https://www.india.gov.in/spotlight/pradhan-mantri-vishwakarma-scheme
[6] Kanungo, S. and Chakrabarti, A. (2021). ‘Gold governance and goldsmithery: Economic sociology of an informal manufacturing sector in India’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 55(2), pp. 172–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00699667211007514
[7] Khan, S.N. (2014). ‘Qualitative research method: Grounded theory’, International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), pp. 224–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p224
[8] Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
[9] Rasika, R.B. (2024). ‘Threads of heritage: A comparative analysis of Punjab and Thai embroidery’, Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 23(2), pp. 128–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56042/ijtk.v23i2.4557
[10] Rastogi, T., Devi, S.M., Kushwah, M., Thakuriya, K., Vas, N., Munjal, K. and Roy, R. (2024). ‘Design interventions: A pathway to elevate Tharu applique’. International Journal of Home Science, 10 (2), pp 370 –382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/23957476.2024.v10.i2f.1646
[11] Reeves, R. (1962). Cire perdue casting in India. New Delhi: Craft Museum.
[12] Risley, H.H. (1891). The tribes and castes of Bengal, Vols. 1–2. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.
[13] Saunders, M.N.K. (2011). Research methods for business students. 5th Ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
[14] Scrase, T.J. (2003). ‘Precarious production: Globalization and artisan labor in the Third World’, Third World Quarterly, 24(3), pp. 449–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659032000084401
[15] Sharma, M. and Thatte, A. (2021). ‘Exploring craft traditions of India: Heritage crafts as a curricular gateway for interdisciplinary learning’, Art Education, 74(3), pp. 43–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.1876473
[16] Smith, D. and Kochhar, R. (2006). ‘The Dhokra artisans of West Bengal: A case study of regional intervention’, in Proceedings of the IFAC Multitrack Conference (ACS’04), Vienna, 2–4 September. Elsevier.
[17] Tsing, A.L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691263526
[18] Udensi, L.O., Igbara, F.N., Paago, J.K. and Chieke, E.O. (2014). ‘The role of craft and artisan cooperative societies in the socio-economic advancement of its members in Abia State, Nigeria’, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), pp. 483–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n2p483
[19] UNESCO. (2013). Rural craft and cultural hubs project – West Bengal. https://core.unesco.org/en/project/922IND4006
[20] Woodman, D. (2016). ‘The sociology of generations and youth studies’, in Wyn, J. and Cahill, H. (eds.) Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood. 2nd edn. London: Routledge, pp. 7–15.
