Study on Verification and Testing Strategies for Quantum Circuits

Authors

  • Jyoti Research Scholar, (Physics)
  • Dr. Amitabh Wahi Research Guide, Bhagwant University Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
  • Prof. (Dr.) S.B.L Tripathi Research Guide, Bhagwant University Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n03.039

Keywords:

Dependability, Transformational, Randomized, Simulation-Based, Measurement and Characterization, Tailored and Cryptography

Abstract

In this research paper, I have thoroughly described about the topic “study on Verification and Testing Strategies for Quantum Circuits.” The research on quantum circuit verification and testing methodologies examines how to ensure the dependability and functioning of quantum computing systems, which are crucial to their transformational potential. Quantum circuits use superposition and entanglement, which need verification and testing methods. Innovative quantum circuit-specific methodologies are needed since conventional computing methods fail in quantum computing. A major research area is simulation-based verification, which compares simulated quantum circuit outputs to genuine hardware implementations. Developers may identify circuit design or implementation problems by comparing simulated and predicted results, enabling incremental improvement. Randomized benchmarking procedures may also evaluate quantum circuit integrity and error rates. These protocols quantify operational features of circuits by submitting them to randomized operations and evaluating their performance against preset benchmarks, leading attempts to enhance reliability and performance. Fault-tolerant methods, such as error correction codes, reduce quantum hardware noise and mistakes, improving quantum circuit reliability. The incorporation of error correcting techniques makes quantum circuits more resilient to environmental perturbations, making them more practical. Advanced quantum metrology and characterization methods provide accurate measurement and characterization of quantum systems, making quantum circuit testing and validation easier. These approaches help identify circuit performance improvements by correctly characterizing quantum features and behavior. This research integrates simulation-based verification, randomized benchmarking procedures, fault-tolerant approaches, and quantum metrology to ensure quantum circuit functioning and dependability. This research advances quantum technologies and realizes their transformative potential in cryptography, materials science, and other fields by explaining verification and testing strategies tailored to quantum computing systems

References

T. Peham, L. Burgholzer, and R. Wille, “On optimal subarchitectures for quantum circuit mapping,” ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2023.

S. A. Metwalli and R. Van Meter, “A tool for debugging quantum circuits,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE). IEEE, 2022, pp. 624–634.

O'Brien, J.L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2020). Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photonics, 14(6), 315-316.

J. Preskill, “Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond,” Quantum, vol. 2, p. 79, 2018.

T. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. O’Brien, “Quantum computers,” Nature, vol. 464, pp. 45–53, Mar. 2010.

Montanaro, “Quantum algorithms: an overview,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 2, p. 15023, 2016.

Pappas, D.P., Saffman, M., & DeMille, D. (2018). Quantum computing with defects. Science, 359(6376), 530-531.

Devitt, S.J., Stephens, A.M., Munro, W.J., & Nemoto, K. (2017). Requirements for fault‐tolerant factoring on an atom‐optics quantum computer. Annalen der Physik, 529(6), 1600319.

Chuang, I.L., Gershenfeld, N., & Kubinec, M.G. (2016). Experimental implementation of fast quantum searching. Physical Review Letters, 80(15), 3408.

Blume-Kohout, R. (2017). Robust calibration of a universal single-qubit gate set via robust phase estimation. Physical Review A, 95(4), 042312.

Kelly, J., Barends, R., Fowler, A.G., Megrant, A., Jeffrey, E., White, T.C., ... & Cleland, A.N. (2015). State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature, 519(7541), 66-69.

Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K. (2013). Quantum error correction for beginners. Reports on Progress in Physics, 76(7), 076001.

F. T. Chong, D. Franklin, and M. Martonosi, “Programming languages and compiler design for realistic quantum hardware,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 180–187, 2017.

Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I.L. (2010). Quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation. Nature, 404(6775), 289-291.

Downloads

Published

15-03-2024

How to Cite

Jyoti, Wahi, A., & Tripathi, S. . (2024). Study on Verification and Testing Strategies for Quantum Circuits . RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 9(3), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n03.039