Motivation and Retention in the Modern Workplace: Adapting Maslow, Herzberg, and Vroom for Retention Strategies in the Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n5.020Keywords:
Employee Retention, Motivation Theories, Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, Organizational BehaviourAbstract
This research paper explores the application and contemporary relevance of three foundational motivation theories—Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, and Vroom’s Expectancy Theory—in understanding and improving employee retention within modern organizational contexts. Using a comparative case study approach, the study examines how these motivational frameworks are implemented in five leading companies: Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Google, Deloitte, and McKinsey & Company. The analysis reveals that while classical in origin, these theories remain highly applicable when adapted to current business challenges such as hybrid work models, generational shifts, technological transformation, and cultural dynamics—particularly within Indian contexts exemplified by Infosys and TCS. Each company demonstrates unique yet overlapping strategies rooted in motivational principles: Infosys and TCS emphasize career progression, learning ecosystems, and job security (Maslow, Herzberg); Google prioritizes autonomy, recognition, and psychological safety (Maslow, Herzberg, Vroom); Deloitte leverages structured performance feedback and flexible policies to align efforts with meaningful rewards (Vroom); while McKinsey fosters purpose-driven work and leadership mentoring to enhance engagement and retention (Maslow, Vroom). Through this comparative framework, the study shows that personalized and culturally attuned motivation strategies—centered on autonomy, fairness, recognition, and growth—significantly contribute to employee satisfaction and reduce attrition. These strategies, however, require nuanced application across different organizational cultures and workforce demographics. Furthermore, the paper identifies critical research gaps, particularly the need for cross-cultural validation of traditional motivation theories and a deeper understanding of the balance between intrinsic and extrinsic motivators in remote and hybrid work environments. It highlights how Vroom’s Expectancy Theory is especially relevant in virtual settings where transparency, trust in reward systems, and effort-performance linkage are paramount. Similarly, Herzberg’s distinction between hygiene and motivator factors offers valuable insights into structuring effective hybrid work policies, while Maslow’s higher-order needs—esteem and self-actualization—align closely with modern desires for meaningful, purpose-driven careers. In conclusion, this study provides actionable insights for HR professionals and organizational leaders by emphasizing the integration of multiple motivational constructs into flexible, inclusive, and sustainable retention strategies. As the nature of work continues to evolve, leveraging a theory-informed approach enables organizations to foster a resilient, loyal, and high-performing workforce across diverse global and cultural landscapes.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Al-Emadi, A. A. Q., Schwabenland, C., & Wei, Q. (2015). The vital role of employee retention in human resource management: A literature review. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(3), 7.
Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining Talent: Replacing Misconceptions with Evidence-Based Strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.2.48
Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining Talent: Replacing Misconceptions with Evidence-Based Strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.2.48
Amor, A. M. (2023). Contributions of Motivation Theories to the Design and Implementation of Employee Reward Policies. Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development Book Series, 255–269. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7212-5.ch013
Bernard, B. (2012). Factors that determine academic staff retention and commitment in private tertiary institutions in Botswana: Empirical review. Global advanced research Journal of management and Business studies, 1(9), 278-299.
Campbell, N., McAllister, L., & Eley, D. (2012). The influence of motivation in recruitment and retention of rural and remote allied health professionals: a literature review. Rural and Remote Health, 12(3), 1900. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH1900
Chiat, L. C., & Panatik, S. A. (2019). Perceptions of employee turnover intention by Herzberg’s motivation-hygiene theory: A systematic literature review. Journal of Research in Psychology, 1(2), 10-15.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Deshmukh, S., Joshi, A., Shinde, S., & Sharma, M. (2023). Role of HR in Talent Acquisition and Recruitment: Best Practices for Hiring Top Talent. European Economic Letters. https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v13i5.909
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Hausknecht, J. P., Rodda, J., & Howard, M. J. (2009). Targeted employee retention: Performance-based and job-related differences in reported reasons for staying. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20279
Hattangadi, V., & Shinde, S. (2025). The interplay of energy and ego: understanding human development through chakras and Erikson’s theory. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, Volume 27(Issue 2), Ser. 6. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2702062229
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Hom, P. W., Allen, D. G., & Griffeth, R. W. (2019). Employee retention and turnover: Why employees stay or leave. Routledge.
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
Hussainy, S. S. (2020). Review on motivational theories & models: Its application for employees’ retention in organizations. International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science, 6(1), 40-46
Hussainy, S. S. (2020). Review on Motivational Theories & Models: Its application for Employees’ Retention in Organizations. International Journal of Business, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.33642/IJBASS.V6N1P5
Hussainy, S. S., & Al-Wahaibi, M. A.(2022). Motivational Theories and Models for Employees Motivation & Retention. Current Aspects in Business, Economics and Finance Vol. 6, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cabef/v6/8538F
Infosys Limited. (2023). Annual Report 2022-2023. Retrieved from (https://www.infosys.com/investors/reports-filings/annual-report/)
Kumar, A., & Sharma, S. (2022). Motivation in modern workplaces: Applying classical theories to Indian IT industry. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 12(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v12i3.19832
Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 485–516. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.55.090902.142105
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work Motivation and Satisfaction: Light at the End of the Tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9280.1990.TB00207.X
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069391
Mishra, R. K., Sarkar, S., & Kiranmai, J. (2014). Green HRM: innovative approach in Indian public enterprises. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 26-42.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237
Natarajan, S. D., & Palanissamy, A. (2015). Employee Motivation & Encouraging Retention in the Workplace: A Critical Study. International Journal of Management Sciences, 5(10), 709–715. https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljms/v5i10p5.html
Ramírez García, I., Del Cerro Ramón, S., & Fornells Herrera, A. (2019). The role of work motivation based on values in employee’s retention in the 21st century. Management Studies, 2019, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Mar.-Apr.).
Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American academy of business, 5(1/2), 52-63.
SHRM India. (2023). Employee motivation and hybrid work models: Challenges and solutions in Indian IT sector. SHRM Research Briefs.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Tahir, K. H. K., & Iraqi, K. M. (2018). Employee performance and retention: A comparative analysis of Theory X, Y and Maslow’s Theory. Journal of Management Sciences, 5(1), 100-110.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).