Perceptions of Pre-Service Teachers on the Engagement with the Field Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n8.024Keywords:
Perceptions, Pre-Service Teachers, Engagement with the Field (EWF), Teacher EducationAbstract
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has revolutionised teacher education in India by emphasising experiential learning and extensive field engagement. This study explores pre-service teachers’ perceptions regarding their engagement with field practices, focusing on the structured internship model introduced in the B.Ed. curriculum. A descriptive survey was conducted among 33 pre-service teachers from CTEAMS Hyderabad to assess their perceptions of field engagement. Findings reveal that 72.73% of pre-service teachers hold a moderate perception of engagement with field practices, while a smaller proportion exhibits high (12.12%) and low (15.15%) perceptions. Age and teaching experience significantly influenced these perceptions, with older and more experienced participants showing a greater appreciation for field engagement. However, variables such as educational qualification and school type (government, aided, or private) did not significantly impact perceptions. Despite the structured internship framework under NCTE (2014) & NEP (2020), challenges persist, including inconsistent implementation, lack of mentorship, inadequate assessment of teaching competencies, and limited community engagement. These gaps highlight the need for a more standardised, well-supported internship program that ensures a meaningful, reflective, and practice-oriented approach in teacher education. The study provides insights for policymakers, curriculum planners, and teacher educators to enhance the efficacy of field engagement in pre-service teacher training.
References
Adu-Yeboah, C., & Kwaah, C. Y. (2018). Preparing teacher trainees for field experience: Lessons from on-campus practical experience in Ghana. African Journal of Teacher Education, 6(2), 88-102.
Andhra Pradesh State Council of Educational Research and Training. (2011). Position paper on teacher education and teacher professional development.
Amer, T. S., & Ismail, O. H. (2014). An evaluation of the internship program at the College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University. International Journal of Educational Development, 36(3), 45-57.
Archana, S. (2018). A study of attitude of teacher trainees towards two-year B.Ed. colleges in Hyderabad. Journal of Teacher Education and Research, 13(2), 112-125.
Chakrabarty, P. (2016). Implementation of internship in two-year B.Ed. course: A challenge or routine task. Educational Research Review, 25(4), 76-89.
Choudhury, R. (2018). Extended internship of two-year B.Ed. curriculum: Examining underlying challenges. Teacher Education Journal, 10(1), 23-40.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.
Das, R. (2022). Teacher education and field engagement: A critical analysis. Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 45-60.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2016). Reflective practice in ESL teacher development groups: From practices to principles. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rashmi, & Aditya, R. (2024). Mentoring and Supervision Challenges in B.Ed Internships: A Stakeholder Analysis in Patna, Bihar, India. GPH-International Journal of Educational Research, 7(09), 70-80. Retrieved from https://gphjournal.org/index.php/er/article/view/1600. https://gphjournal.org/index.php/er/article/view/1600
Indu. (2023). Challenges in teacher education programs: Quality and implementation issues. International Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 12(3), 45-57. https://www.indusedu.org/pdfs/IJREISS/IJREISS_3756_43601.pdf
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kumar, P., & Sharma, R. (2020). Constructivism in teacher education: The role of internships. Journal of Educational Theory, 28(3), 102-115.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Education (MoE). (2020). National Education Policy 2020.
National Council for Teacher Education. (2006). Curriculum framework for teacher education.
National Council for Teacher Education. (2014). Norms and standards for B.Ed. and practice teaching engagement with the field.
Education. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2022, from https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English.pdf
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Sharma, L. (2021). Internship effectiveness in teacher education: A study of field engagement practices. International Journal of Educational Studies, 19(2), 75-89.
Sharma, R. (2023). Evaluating teaching competencies in pre-service teacher education: Challenges and future directions. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15(2), 29-44
Singh, M. (2019). Understanding school engagement in teacher training programs. Indian Journal of Pedagogy, 22(1), 33-49.
Vijayalakshmi, R., & Menon, R. B. (2017). Perspectives of teacher educators on teaching competencies in the two-year B.Ed. program. Indian Journal of Teacher Education, 8(1), 35-49.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zeichner, K. (2018). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Teachers and Teaching, 24(4), 369-387.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).