A Review on Critical Language Pedagogy: A Formal Analysis of Theory, Practice, and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n10.009Keywords:
Critical Language Pedagogy, social consciousness, problem-posing education, dialogical exchange, project-based learningAbstract
In this fast-paced world, the concept of false consciousness has escalated to an alarming extent, where people are unable to decipher truth from false, which can be equated to man’s tendency to normalize and sometimes even legitimize injustices prevailing in the society. Critical Language Pedagogy (CLP) aims to critically analyse the world around by evaluating the language as it relates to issues of equity, power, and social justice, and to inform a critical stance, response and/or action. It aids one to have multiple perspectives and enables to look for bias, if any, its sources, or reasons. Eventually, CLP encourage people to realize that repetition is not reality and to change the norms that are believed to be immutable for ages. This article presents a critical examination of the theoretical background and practical applications of CLP as a transformative approach within the field of language education. Employed with foundations in the work of Paulo Freire and strengthened by recent arguments for ethical commitment by Crookes, this article explores the mechanisms by which CLP empowers learners to critically deconstruct linguistic and social norms, thereby fostering a heightened state of social consciousness and agency. The article surveys key pedagogical strategies, including problem-posing education, dialogical exchange and project-based learning, which are increasingly realized through multimodal and digital formats. Furthermore, this analysis addresses criticisms directed at CLP, the inherent complexity of its implementation, and the necessity of engaging with contemporary decolonial and algorithmic challenges. The article concludes with an outlining of prospective research directions, advocating for empirical investigations designed to measure the long-term impact of CLP on learner empowerment, academic achievement, and social transformation.
References
Auerbach, E. R. (1995). The politics of the ESL classroom: ESL literacy, critical pedagogy, and empowerment. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education (pp. 98-115). Cambridge University Press.
Blackledge, A., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. International journal of bilingualism, 5(3), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069010050030101
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Cho, S. (2025). Rethinking “action” in Critical Language Pedagogy: A snapshot of multimodal resistance and pedagogical possibilities in China. Journal of Critical Language Studies, 10(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.46983
Crookes, G. V. (2021). Critical language pedagogy: An introduction to principles and values. ELT Journal, 75(4), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab020
Crookes, G. V., & Abednia, A. (2022). Critical language pedagogy: Principles and practices. Routledge.
Crookes, G. V., & Ziegler, N. (2021). Critical Language Pedagogy and Task-Based Language Teaching: Reciprocal relationship and mutual benefit. Education Sciences, 11(6), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060254
Derrida, J. (1967). Of grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Essabari, S., & Mhamed, M. B. (2025). Critical Pedagogy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Beyond Utopian Ideals. International Journal of English Language Studies, 7(3), 01-09. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2025.7.3.1
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language. Pantheon Books.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.
Godley, A. J., & Minnici, A. (2008). Critical language pedagogy in an urban high school English class. Urban education, 43(3), 319-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907311801
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1944). Dialectic of enlightenment. Social Studies Association of America.
Jackson, L., & Kennett, B. (2025). Critical language pedagogues in Japan: Enhancing student receptivity. ELT Journal, 79(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccae024
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
Kubota, R. (2004). Critical multiculturalism and second language education. Norton, B & Toohey, K.(Eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning (pp. 30 – 52). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524834.003
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2021). The politics of decolonial language: Thinking from the border. Duke University Press.
Morgan, B. (1997). A critical review of critical language pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 519-535.
Motha, S. (2020). Is an Antiracist and Decolonizing Applied Linguistics Possible? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190520000100
Muszyńska, B. (2023). Moving beyond reflection: Towards epistemic reflexivity in language education. In B. Muszyńska & Thomas, H. (Eds.), Putting critical language pedagogy into practice (pp. 1-9). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003399414
Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409-429.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600790
Pang, S., Nol, E., & Heng, K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy: A Necessity in Modern Language Education. Journal of English Learner Education, 17(1), 8.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Sheridan, R., & Tanaka, K. M. (2024). Global Issues in Local Contexts: Japanese University EFL Learners' Reactions to the Development of Relevant and Engaging SDGS Materials. TESL-EJ, 28(1), n1. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109a4
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Bloomsbury Academic.
Stockwell, G. (2024). ChatGPT in language teaching and learning: Exploring the road we’re travelling. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 2273-2273. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.2273
Ulla, M. B., Advincula, M. J. C., Mombay, C. D. S., Mercullo, H. M. A., Nacionales, J. P., & Entino-Senorita, A. D. (2024). How can GenAI foster an inclusive language classroom? A critical language pedagogy perspective from Philippine university teachers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100314
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).