Pastoral Women in the Himalayas: A Case Study of the Gaddi Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n11.002Keywords:
Pastoral women, Gaddi community, Chamba, climate variability, conservation enclosuresAbstract
This paper examines the lives and labor of pastoral women among the Gaddi community of the western Himalayas, focusing on Chamba and adjoining districts in present-day Himachal Pradesh. While Gaddi pastoralism is often narrated through the movements of male shepherds and flocks across summer dhars and winter bans, the work of women sustains this economy’s ecological and social rhythms. Building on environmental history, political ecology, and feminist scholarship, the study situates women’s labor within layered regimes of property, access, and governance from the late nineteenth century to the present. It argues that colonial forestry regimes, justified by an ideology of “improvement,” transformed commons into regulated reserves, intensifying the time and risk burdens borne by women. The post-Independence state both widened opportunities (roads, schools, political reservation) and renewed constraints (hydropower corridors, conservation closures), producing a contradictory modernity in which Gaddi women navigate expanded public roles and persistent ecological labor. Drawing on the works of Thomas R. Metcalf, Mahesh Rangarajan, Bina Agarwal, K. Sivaramakrishnan, Ramachandra Guha, Chetan Singh, and contemporary reports and policy documents, the paper develops a historically grounded portrait of gendered mobility, subsistence, care work, and political voice. It concludes by highlighting emergent pressures—climate variability, conservation enclosures, hydropower infrastructures—and argues for policy grounded in gender-sensitive rights and participatory pastoral governance(Metcalf; Rangarajan; Agarwal).
References
Agarwal, Bina. A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
—. Gender and Green Governance: The Political Economy of Women’s Presence Within and Beyond Community Forestry. Oxford University Press, 2010.
Axelby, Richard. “Who Has the Stick Has the Buffalo: Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion on a Pasture in the Indian Himalayas.” South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 2016, doi:10.4000/samaj.4096.
Bénéï, Véronique. Schooling Passions: Nation, History, and Language in Contemporary Western India. Stanford University Press, 2008.
Chetan Singh. Natural Premises: Ecology and Peasant Life in the Western Himalaya, 1800–1950. Oxford University Press, 1998.
Down To Earth. “Himachal Identifies Traditional Pastoral Routes, Restricts Afforestation in Key Areas.” 2023, www.downtoearth.org.in/news/forests/himachal-identifies-traditional-pastoral-routes-restricts-afforestation-in-key-areas-92564. Accessed 28 Oct. 2025.
Government of India. Indian Forest Act, 1878 (Act No. 7 of 1878). Government of India, 1878.
—. Indian Forest Act, 1927 (Act No. 16 of 1927). Government of India, 1927.
—. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. Ministry of Law and Justice, 2007.
Mahesh Rangarajan. India’s Wildlife History: An Introduction. Permanent Black, 2001.
Metcalf, Thomas R. Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Punjab Government. Gazetteer of the Chamba State, 1904. The Punjab States Gazetteers, Civil and Military Gazette Press, 1904.
Ribot, Jesse C., and Nancy Lee Peluso. “A Theory of Access.” Rural Sociology, vol. 68, no. 2, 2003, pp. 153–81.
Saberwal, Vasant K. “The Political Ecology of Exclusion: An Analysis of the Gaddi Grazing Crisis in Himachal Pradesh.” HIMALAYA, vol. 18, no. 1, 1998, pp. 49–65.
Sivaramakrishnan, K. Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India. Stanford University Press, 1999.
Thakkar, Himanshu. “Hydropower in the Himalaya: Trouble at High Dams.” South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People, 2013, sandrp.in. Accessed 28 Oct. 2025.
Guha, Ramachandra. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya. Revised ed., University of California Press, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).