Contemporary Global Crisis: Distancing Religion from Politics

Authors

  • P.M. Suresh Kumar Department of Social Work, Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram - 676517, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n10.001

Keywords:

Contemporary, Crisis, Religion, Politics, Distancing, Oppression, Neoslavery

Abstract

Religion is exercising greater influence upon people in present times than ever before. Elementary forms of religious life could be traced to the distant past, although they evolved to such classic forms over the years. Religion has contributed to consolidating human groups into larger unified societies. Polity is a much later outcome of organized life. The former existed before and the latter evolved later. Religion always maintained a status quo. It has been static for a given population, while polity has been witnessing changes during different times across the world and in any given society independent of religion. However, both served to maintain social order. Notwithstanding these, religion has been an oppressive instrument, in as much the same way as politics, the modus operandi differs though. Religion has inbuilt elements serving oppression wholly or partly to various segments of the population as it applies to. Politics has undergone bureaucratization with increased concentration of power, rigidity of hierarchy, and leadership stereotyping. One of the contemporary disturbing developments has been the increasingly predatory role of religion over politics. A variety of factors contributed to it. Chiefly, at the local level are selective education, religious indoctrination, repressive dogmas, and increasing radicalism. At the global level factors such as invasions and conquest, power disequilibrium, demographic factors, geo-political factors, trade gaps, and monopoly of Resources, etc. are added to it. This study is an attempt to examine the nexus between religion and politics and how it is furthering the enslavement of the masses.

Author Biography

P.M. Suresh Kumar, Department of Social Work, Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram - 676517, INDIA

Dr. Suresh Kumar received his Master’s degree in Social Work from Loyola College, Trivandrum and Ph.D in Sociology from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has vast experience of 18 years in teaching and research and served as Professor at Srinivas University, Mangalore and CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore. He has published extensively on wide range of topics in peer reviewed journals.  Currently serving as Head of Department of Social Work at Priyadarshini Arts and Science College, Malappuram (Kerala).

References

Ballantine, Jeanne. H, and Roberts, Keith.A (2011), Our Social World, Sage Publications, Canada.

Byrne, David (2009), Social Exclusion, Rawat Publications, New Delhi.

Chattopadhyay, Aparajita(ed.), (2013), Poverty and Social Exclusion in India, Rawat Publication.

De, Mahendra.S(2007), Inclusive Growth in India, Oxford University Press, New Discipline.

Jaya Raj.D and Subramanian.S (2010), Poverty, Inequality and Population, Oxford University Press, New Delhi

Madan, T.N (2004), India's Religions: Perspectives from Sociology and History, Oxford University, New Delhi.

Midgley, James (2014), Social Development: Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, Jaipur.

Nagla, B.K(2013), Indian Sociological Thought, Rawat Publications, Jaipur.

Ritzer, George (2021), Sociological Theory, Rawat Publication, New Delhi.

Sharma, Y.K (2007), Indian Society: Issues and Problems, Lakshmi Narain Agarwal, Agra

Singh, Yogendra (2019), Modernization of Indian Tradition, Rawat Publications, Jaipur

Turner, J.H., Beeghly. L and Powers C.H., (2018), The Emergence of Sociological Theory, Rawat Publications, Jaipur.

Verma, Vidhu (2015), Unequal Worlds: Discrimination and Social Inequality in Modern India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi

Downloads

Published

13-10-2023

How to Cite

P.M, S. K. (2023). Contemporary Global Crisis: Distancing Religion from Politics. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 8(10), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2023.v08.n10.001