Enhancing Secondary School Biology Students’ Achievement Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

Authors

  • Jagannath Kunar Asst. Professor in Educational Studies (TE), Dharanidhar University, Odisha, India Author
  • Pramod Behera Asst. Professor in Education, Dharanidhar University, Keonjhar, Odisha, India Author
  • Santosh Mahanta Research Assistant, MRIP-OSHEC, Dharanidhar University, Odisha, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n04.021

Keywords:

Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, academic achievement, community knowledge, conceptual clarity

Abstract

Culture is a way of livings, things and behaviours pattern of every community. This rigorous research investigates the effectiveness of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (CRP) on the academic achievement of secondary school students, especially biology students. In traditional science instruction classroom system remains textbook driven and disconnected from student’s culture and lived experiences. In this context, students unable to connect classroom instructions to real life experiences. CRP helps to integrates learner’s cultural backgrounds and indigenous community knowledge into the curriculum to create inclusive, equitable and conceptual clarity. This study utilized two group pre-test and post-test experimental designs which involving 75 Class- IX students. The experimental group received CRP-based instruction over twelve weeks while the control group followed a conventional lecture-based approach. Data analysis through ANCOVA revealed a statistically significant difference in performance with the CRP group achieving a notably higher adjusted mean score (21.47) compared to the control group (18.20). The results demonstrated a moderate-to-large effect size that indicating the CRP effectively enhances understanding across genders while controlling for prior knowledge. The findings prove that connecting biological concepts with indigenous knowledge and student’s sociocultural realities significantly improves actively engagement in classroom and academic success. This study concludes that CRP is a transformative pedagogical orientation that promotes inclusive and meaningful learning. It advocates for curriculum reform and teacher training focused on cultural responsiveness to bridge achievement gaps and develop scientifically literate and socially responsible citizens.

Author Biographies

  • Jagannath Kunar, Asst. Professor in Educational Studies (TE), Dharanidhar University, Odisha, India

    Dr. Kunar is presently serving as Head, PG. Dept. of Education, Dharanidhar University, Keonjhar. Dr. Kunar had 10 years of teaching and research experience in UG/PG & B.Ed. He had master’s degree, Masters in science (Microbiology), M.Ed., MA in Psychology & PhD in Education. His area of specialization are educational technology and neurocognitive science. He had published numerous publications to his name published in national and international and Scopus journals. He is also guiding PhD scholars, BA, MA and B.Ed. students as research supervisor. He is recently working on a Project Entitled “Effectiveness of Culturally Responsive Pedagogical Practices on learning achievement and emotional intelligence of Secondary School science students” under Mukhyamantri Research & Innovation Programme (MRIP)-2023, Funded by Govt. of Odisha.

  • Pramod Behera, Asst. Professor in Education, Dharanidhar University, Keonjhar, Odisha, India

    Mr. Behera is presently servings as Assistant Professor in education at Dharanidhar University, Keonjhar.  He also dedicated academician, educator, and independent researcher in Education and Sustainable Development with a special focus on Early Childhood Care Education (ECCE) and Tribal Education. He has published seven research paper and two reviews articles in both national and international journal, two-year research guide experience in U.G and P.G level and completed his Bachelor Degree, Master Degree in Education and Academic Research Report Writing from NIITTR Kolkata, West Bengal, He has teaching experience as Lecturer in Education. Qualified UGC-NET, awarded the University Gold Medal in M.A Education and recognised as Best Student of the Year in 2024. Mr. Behera has contributed his research work in various national and international books.

  • Santosh Mahanta, Research Assistant, MRIP-OSHEC, Dharanidhar University, Odisha, India

    Mr. Mahanta is currently working as a Research Assistant under the OSHEC MRIP 2024 project. He has successfully completed his Master of Science (M.Sc.) and Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.). He is actively engaged in academic research and contributes to educational and scientific development through his work in the project.

References

[1] Banks, J. A. (2015). Multicultural education. In International encyclopaedia of the social & behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Elsevier.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92097-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92097-X

[2] Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press. https://www.karlancer.com/api/file/1716973202-jtkA.pdf

[3] Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. https://www.tcpress.com/culturally-responsive-teaching-9780807758762

[4] Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

[5] OECD (2018), Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en

[6] Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press. https://www.academia.edu/38506554/Culturally_Responsive_Teaching_and_The_Brain

[7] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674576292

[8] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000).

How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/9853

[9] Aikenhead, G.S. (2006) Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-Based Practice. Teachers College Press. https://www.scirp.org/%28S%28ny23rubfvg45z345vbrepxrl%29%29/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=4084448

[10] Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 104(3), 482-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00170

[11] Bang, M., & Medin, D. L. (2010).Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392

[12] Buxton, C. A. (2010).Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching and learning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 120–135. http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/10665680903408932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903408932

[13] National Research Council. (2012).A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1302130

[14] Tan, Puay Hoon, et al. "The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast." Histopathology 77.2 (2020): 181-185. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/server/api/core/bitstreams/0124969c-d50f-4934-b1c2-cd63abf2f05c/content DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14091

[15] Nieto, S. (2010). Learning, the social context, and multicultural education. In The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities (pp. 33–49). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.65528/9780807773130-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65528/9780807773130-005

[16] Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://archive.org/details/dreamkeeperssucc0000lads

[17] Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244

[18] Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066

[19] Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does Culturally Relevant Teaching Work? An Examination From Student Perspectives. Sage Open, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016660744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016660744

[20] Brown-Jeffy, S., & Cooper, J. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 65–84. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ914924.pdf

[21] Morrison, K. A., Robbins, H. H., & Rose, D. G. (2008). Operationalizing culturally relevant pedagogy: A synthesis of classroom-based research. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(4), 433–452.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680802400006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680802400006

[22] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

[23] Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing Culturally Responsive Teachers: Rethinking the Curriculum: Rethinking the Curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001003

[24] Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

[25] Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/pedagogy-of-the-oppressed-9781501314131/

[26] Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/curriculum-foundations-principles-and-issues/P200000003182

[27] Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo3624032.html

[28] Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books. https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/jean-piaget/the-psychology-of-the-child/9780465095003/

[29] Durkheim, E. (1956). Education and sociology (S. D. Fox, Trans.). New York: Free Press. https://www.routledge.com/Education-and-Sociology/Durkheim/p/book/9780029072808v

[30] Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://www.hms.harvard.edu/bss/neuro/bornlab/nb204/statistics/bootstrap.pdf

[31] Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

[32] Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://www.hms.harvard.edu/bss/neuro/bornlab/nb204/statistics/bootstrap.pdf

[33] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

[34] Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

[35] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

[36] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

[37] Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-35002-000

[38] Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145–186. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069002145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069002145

[39] Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). The role of prior knowledge in learning: A meta-analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 603–621. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2630138/

[40] Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037

[41] Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=2046660

[42] Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620

[43] Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198

[44] Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204

[45] Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2006). Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. American Journal of Physics, 74(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2162549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2162549

[46] Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Kunar, J., Behera, P., & Mahanta, S. (2026). Enhancing Secondary School Biology Students’ Achievement Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 11(4), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2026.v11.n04.021