Reimagining Indian Education for Viksit Bharat @2047: Addressing the Challenges of Shadow Education and Inequity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n6.009Keywords:
Shadow Education, Viksit Bharat @2047, Educational Challenges, Quality Education, Equitable EducationAbstract
Viksit Bharat @2047-Developed India by 2047 is a visionary initiative launched by the Government of India with the goal of transforming the nation into a developed country by the time it celebrates 100 years of independence. In achieving this vision, education serves as a critical pillar, as no nation can truly progress without providing quality education to its citizens. Equitable access to quality education empowers individuals with positivity, problem-solving skills, and a mindset geared toward innovation and creativity. In today’s era of educational technology, the landscape of education including pedagogical approaches, curriculum structures, and methods of assessment has undergone significant transformation. However, the increasing commercialization of education has emerged as a serious concern. Coaching centers, private tutoring services, and cram schools have proliferated, contributing to what is globally recognized as shadow education or supplementary education. Shadow education poses a major challenge to the realization of Viksit Bharat @2047. A comprehensive review of the literature indicates that this form of education is primarily focused on academic performance, competition, and exam-centric success. It tends to promote rote memorization rather than fostering holistic development, which directly contradicts the aims of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. This paper explores the educational challenges that hinder progress toward the Viksit Bharat vision, such as inequitable access, insufficient focus on character development, the neglect of vocational education, and the lack of emphasis on critical thinking and creativity. It also offers key recommendations for policymakers to address these issues, which are essential to accelerating national development and ensuring an inclusive and empowered India by 2047.
References
Adeleye, N. O. O., Eden, N. C. A., & Adeniyi, N. I. S. (2024). Educational technology and the digital divide: A conceptual framework for technical literacy inclusion. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(1), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.1.0405
Agrawal, A., Gupta, P., & Mondal, D. (2024). Determinants of private tutoring demand in rural India. In The Journal of Development Studies, The Journal of Development Studies (Vol. 60, Issue 1, pp. 83–107) [Journal-article]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2273798
Alam, M. B., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Teaching in the shadows: Exploring teachers’ intentions and behaviors towards private tutoring in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 9(2), e12534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12534
ASER Centre. (2022). Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2015 (Technical report). New Delhi, India: ASER Centre.
Bae, S. H., & Choi, K. H. (2023). The cause of institutionalized private tutoring in Korea: defective public schooling or a universal desire for family reproduction? ECNU Review of Education, 7(1), 12–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231182722
Bai, M. & School of Mei Bai, Chengdu College of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. (2021). Shadow education and social reproduction. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 637, 260.
Becker, G. S. & National Bureau of Economic Research. (1993). Human capital (Third, p. cm) [Book]. The University of Chicago Press. https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo3681053.html
Bray, M. (2023). Still in need of confronting: Shadow education and its implications in the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102967
Burgess, S., Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Institute for the Study of Labor, & COEURE: Cooperation on European Research in Economics. (2016). Human Capital and Education: The state of the art in the economics of education. In IZA DP (Report No. 9885). https://repec.iza.org/dp9885.pdf (Original work published 2016)
Davies, S., & Aurini, J. (2006). The Franchising of Private Tutoring: A View from Canada. The Phi Delta Kappan, 88–88(2), 123–128. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20442197
Entrich, S. R., & Lauterbach, W. (2020). Shadow Education in Germany: Compensatory or Status Attainment Strategy? Findings from the German LifE Study. IJREE – International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 7(2–2019), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijree.v7i2.04
Futures of Education initiative, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, & International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together. In Reimagining Our Futures Together. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722
Gupta, A. (2021). Social legitimacy of private tutoring: an investigation of institutional and affective educational practices in India. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 43(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1868978
International Labour Organization. (2021). Social Finance Annual Report 2020 [Report]. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/publns
Jung, J. (2018). Decolonizing educational/curriculum studies in East Asia: problematizing shadow education in South Korea. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 19(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2018.1463074
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2024). ‘To be on the seventh sky’: exploring the nature and push of key factors in Indian parents’ choice for shadow education. Education 3-13, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2412993
Kumar, S., Pandita, P., & Singh, K. (2025). Confronting the Challenges Faced by the Beneficiaries of Shadow Education during COVID-19: An Anecdotal Analysis. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 240–259. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2025/v15/i1/2836
Miah, M. & Tennessee State University. (2024). Digital inequality: the digital divide and educational outcomes. In Tennessee State University [Journal-article]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379258768
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Naik, B., Chandiramani, J., & Majumdar, S. (2024). Is India’s higher education system a case of elusive inclusive development? Cogent Education, 2428874.
NITI Aayog. (2022). Annual Report 2022–23.
Pandita, P., Verma, S., Kumar, S., Bakshi, R., & Aman, N. (2023). Recent Innovations of Computing in Education: Emerging collaborative blended learning models in India. In Lecture notes in electrical engineering (pp. 649–656). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9876-8_49
Pandita, P., Kumar, S., & Bhardwaj, A. (2025). ‘Mirage of professional duties’: the dilemma every teacher encounters in meeting the goal of foundational literacy and numeracy in India. Education 3-13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2025.2456012
Protecting child rights in a time of crises. (2021). In UNICEF Annual Report 2021.
Punjabi, S. (2019). Is shadow education becoming the ‘New’ formal? Effects of pedagogical approaches of IIT-JEE coaching on school education in the city of Delhi. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 17(1), 14–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184919885485
Rangarajan, R., Sharma, U., & Grové, C. (2023). Inclusion and equity in India’s new National Education Policy (NEP): an analysis using the Context Led Model of Education Quality. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2295907
Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9
Spiel, C., Schwartzman, S., Busemeyer, M. R., & International Panel for Social Progress. (2018). The contribution of education to social progress. In Chapter.
Stastny, V., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2020). Editorial [Editorial]. Orbis Scholae, 14(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2020.17
TALIS 2019 Results (Volume I). (2020). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
TALIS 2020 Results (Volume I). (2021). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Tan, C. (2017). Private supplementary tutoring and parentocracy in Singapore. Interchange, 48(4), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9303-4
Tan, C., & Yang, J. (2019). Path-dependency or path-shaping? An analysis of the policy to target exam-orientation in South Korea. Critical Studies in Education, 62(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1611612
Tan, M., & Liu, S. (2023). A way of human capital accumulation: Heterogeneous impact of shadow education on students’ academic performance in China. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231207189
United Nations, & Steiner, A. (2022). ANNUAL REPORT 2022 [Report].
Wang, C., & Wang, L. (2021). The mathematics teacher in shadow education: a new area of focus in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(2), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09522-3
World Bank. (2015). Annual Report 2018. In The World Bank Annual Report 2018. https://www.worldbank.org/annualreport
Xiang, K., Liu, J., Chen, X., & Zhang, A. (2023). Research on the evolution and improvement of China’s shadow education governance policy from the perspective of multiple streams theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1013243
Yung, K. W. (2020). Problematising students’ preference for video-recorded classes in shadow education. Educational Studies, 48(5), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814697
Zhao, W. & Acabridge Academy. (2024). The role of education quality in economic growth. In Highlights in Business, Economics and Management EMFRM 2024 (Vol. 45, pp. 97–98).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).