Revealing and Concealing: An Inquiry into Heidegger’s Technological Thinking

Authors

  • Sushmita Banaras Hindu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n6.024

Keywords:

Heidegger, essence of technology, Gestell, enframing, unconcealment

Abstract

This paper critically engages with the arguments presented by Martin Heidegger in his seminal essay The Question Concerning Technology (1977). His arguments centre around the essence of technology and the ontological dangers that it posits. He challenges the dominant view of technology as instrumental and anthropological. For Heidegger, technology is not merely a tool or a product of human endeavour but rather a distinct mode of revealing and concealing (Aletheia). He proposes the notion of Gestell, or “enframing,” to reveal how modern technology sees the world, nature, and even human beings as standing reserve, reducing them to resources for exploitation. This “enframing” not only reveals but also simultaneously conceals other modes of being and thinking by creating threats to existential and ontological realities. However, Heidegger also discusses Gelassenheit, a contemplative liberation that encourages a free relation with technology by opposing complete submission to calculative thinking. The paper also responds to the claims of essentialism and determinism made by thinkers such as Feenberg, Dreyfus, and Thomson against Heidegger. By revisiting ancient Greek concepts of techne, he differentiates between pre-modern and modern technology. While analyzing the implications of this differentiation and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the article examines how Heidegger’s critique of technology remains relevant in the digital age. The paper concludes that Heidegger advocated for a more reflective and poetic interaction with technology—one that goes beyond mere instrumental rationality.

Author Biography

Sushmita, Banaras Hindu University

Ms. Sushmita holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Arts in English from Banaras Hindu University, Uttar Pradesh, India. She has also completed a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) from Kurukshetra University. Additionally, she is qualified in both the University Grants Commission National Eligibility Test (UGC NET) and the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET).

References

Aydin, Ciano, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. "Transcendence in Technology in Advance." Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2015121742.

Belu, Dana. "Questioning 'Gelassenheit.'" Heidegger Circle Proceedings, vol. 39, 2005, pp. 176–87. https://doi.org/10.5840/heideggercircle20053911.

Belu, Dana S., and Andrew Feenberg. "Heidegger’s Aporetic Ontology of Technology." Inquiry, vol. 53, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740903478376.

Breen, Michael, et al. Technology and Transcendence. Columba Press, 2003.

Dreyfus, Hubert. "Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology." https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/drey.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2022.

Feenberg, Andrew. Questioning Technology. Routledge, 2008.

Gilchrist, Brian. "Questions Concerning Ge-Stell: Heideggerian Confrontations with Technology." Explorations in Media Ecology, vol. 14, no. 3, 2015, pp. 237–55. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme.14.3-4.237_1.

Harvey, Charles W. "Heidegger within the Technium: Re-Viewing the Question Concerning Technology after Kevin Kelly's What Technology Wants." Philosophy in the Contemporary World, vol. 21, no. 1, 2014, pp. 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5840/pcw20142115.

Heidegger, Martin. "The Question Concerning Technology." The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt, Harper & Row, 1977, pp. 3–35.

---. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper & Row, 1977. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf. Accessed [insert access date].

Ihde, Don. "Heidegger’s Philosophy of Technology." Heidegger Circle Proceedings, vol. 12, 1978, pp. 168–208. https://doi.org/10.5840/heideggercircle1978126.

---. "Heidegger on Technology." Philosophy Today, vol. 54, 2010, pp. 101–5. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201054supplement53.

Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business, 2016. (If referring to the book. If you're citing his online articles, format as web sources with access dates.)

Sheehan, Thomas. "Eleven Theses on Heidegger and Technology." Heidegger Circle Proceedings, vol. 35, 2001, pp. 115–22. https://doi.org/10.5840/heideggercircle20013511.

Thomson, Iain. "From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg." Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 2, 2000, pp. 203–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017400407753.

---. "What’s Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg." Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 4, 2000, pp. 429–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017400750051233.

Downloads

Published

16-06-2025

How to Cite

Sushmita. (2025). Revealing and Concealing: An Inquiry into Heidegger’s Technological Thinking. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(6), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n6.024